SMSU Ag Bowl
Feb 07, 2025
Agronomy CDE
Overall

ID: 241 - -
Team Name: Murray County Central
Participant Name:
ALEX HASARA
Individual Rank: 66
Individual Total Score: 157
Team Rank: 16
Team Total Score: 473
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Variety Selection #1-10
PartContestantJudge
1BC
2DB
3AA
4AA
5BC
6CC
7BD
8AA
9CC
10DC
Variety Selection #1-10 - Points per Question6
30
Variety Selection #11-20
Variety Selection #11-20 - Points per Question6
 
General Knowledge Exam #1-20
PartContestantJudge
1BB
2CB
3AC
4AC
5DA
6CB
7DD
8BB
9CD
10CC
11DA
12CD
13DC
14BB
15DD
16BB
17CC
18CB
19BC
20BB
Exam - Points per Question3
27
General Knowledge Exam #21-40
PartContestantJudge
21BC
22CA
23CC
24AA
25DD
26AB
27DB
28AB
29DD
30CC
31AA
32AA
33BB
34BB
35CC
36BD
37DB
38AB
39CB
40BA
Exam - Points per Question3
30
General Knowledge Exam #41-60
PartContestantJudge
41CB
42DA
43AB
44BB
45DD
Exam - Points per Question3
6
General Knowledge Exam Total
63
Practicum Score 1
 
Practicum Score 2
 
Practicum Score 3
 
Practicum Score 4
 
Insect ID - Identification
PartContestantJudge
1 25 25
2 32 23
3 21 21
4 24 24
5 1 27
6 11 15
7 12 28
8 22 22
9  15
10  30
Insect ID - Points per Identification2
8
Insect ID - Economic Impact
PartContestantJudge
1Identification 5Identification 1
2Identification Identification 4
3Identification Identification 3
4Identification 2Identification 4
5 Identification 6
6 Identification 4
7 Identification 6
8 Identification 1
9 Identification 4
10 Identification 6
Insect ID - Points per Impact2
0
Insect ID - Mouth Parts
PartContestantJudge
1Identification 5Identification 1
2Identification Identification 1
3Identification Identification 1
4Identification 1Identification 1
5 Identification 3
6 Identification 1
7 Identification 3
8 Identification 1
9 Identification 1
10 Identification 3
Insect ID - Points per Mouth Part2
2
Insect Identification Total
10
Crop Quality Placing 1
 
Crop Quality Placing 2
 
Crop Quality Reasons 1
PartContestantJudge
1  025
 
Crop Quality Reasons 2
PartContestantJudge
1  025
 
Grain Grading
PartContestantJudge
1  100
 
Variety Selection Score
PartContestantJudge
1  050
 
Disorders - Causal Categories
Disorders - Points per Causal Category3
 
Disorders - Agents
Disorders - Points per Agent4
 
Disorders - Part
Disorders - Points per Part3
 
Agronomic Disorders Total
 
Plant and Seed ID #1-10
PartContestantJudge
1 115 114
2 111 113
3 120 346
4 106 106
5 107
6 320
7 112 101
8 344 312
9 121 334
10  303
Plant and Seed ID - Points per ID6
6
Plant and Seed ID #11-20
PartContestantJudge
11 102 315
12 314
13 347
14 112 121
15 110 119
16 103
17 117 116
18 118 112
19  210
20  202
Plant and Seed ID - Points per ID6
0
Plant and Seed ID #21-30
PartContestantJudge
21 108 201
22 208
23 110
24 121 204
25 122 206
26 122 203
27 211
28 119 205
29 102
30 114 209
Plant and Seed ID - Points per ID6
0
Plant and Seed ID #31-40
PartContestantJudge
31 116 207
32 108 108
33 103 109
34 116 111
35 104 105
36 120
37 331
38 326 306
39 329 305
40 103 333
Plant and Seed ID - Points per ID6
6
Plant and Seed ID #41-50
PartContestantJudge
41 310 115
42 302 328
43 302
44 328 318
45 340 336
46 325
47 302 321
48 322 335
49 322
50 317 311
Plant and Seed ID - Points per ID6
0
Plant and Seed ID Total
12
Equipment/Machinery ID
Equipment/Machinery - Points per ID5
 
Soil & Nutrient Mgmt
PartContestantJudge
1AE
2BB
3AB
4EC
5DD
6AA
7EE
8CC
9CC
10EE
Soil & Nutrient Mgmt - Points per Question6
42
Issues Interview
PartContestantJudge
1 Identification 5
2 Identification 5
3 Identification 5
4 Identification 5
5 Identification 5
6 Identification 5
Issues Interview - Point Values1,2,2,3,4,8
 
Issues Interview Score
 
Commodity Evaluation Total
30
Pest Management Total
10
Team Preparation - Judge 1
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
Team Preparation - Point Values2,2,2,2,2
 
Team Preparation - Judge 2
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
Team Preparation - Point Values2,2,2,2,2
 
Team Preparation - Judge 3
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
Team Preparation - Point Values2,2,2,2,2
 
Team Preparation - Total
 
Team Written Proposal - Judge 1
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
Team Written Proposal - Point Values5,5,5
 
Team Written Proposal - Judge 2
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
Team Written Proposal - Point Values5,5,5
 
Team Written Proposal - Judge 3
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
Team Written Proposal - Point Values5,5,5
 
Team Written Proposal - Total
 
Team Written Plan - Judge 1
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
6  10
7  10
8  10
9  10
10  10
Team Written Plan - Point Values3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5
 
Team Written Plan - Judge 2
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
6  10
7  10
8  10
9  10
10  10
Team Written Plan - Point Values3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5
 
Team Written Plan - Judge 3
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
6  10
7  10
8  10
9  10
10  10
Team Written Plan - Point Values3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5,3.5
 
Team Written Plan - Total
 
Team Oral/Questions - Judge 1
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
Team Oral/Questions - Point Values10,10,7,6,7
 
Team Oral/Questions - Judge 2
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
Team Oral/Questions - Point Values10,10,7,6,7
 
Team Oral/Questions - Judge 3
PartContestantJudge
1  10
2  10
3  10
4  10
5  10
Team Oral/Questions - Point Values10,10,7,6,7
 
Team Oral/Questions - Total
 
Team Preparation Score
 
Team Written Proposal Score
 
Team Written Plan Score
 
Team Presentation and Questions Score
 
Team Exam A - Pest
 
Team Exam B - Nutrient
 
Team Exam C - Soil/Water
 
Team Exam D - Crop
 
Team Exam E - Questions
 
Team Exam Total
 
Team Activity Total
 


AWS100: Friday, April 4, 2025